While Other Rates Decline, Rates on AD&C Loans Trend Up

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

In the second quarter of 2019, interest rates on loans for land acquisition, development, and single-family construction (AD&C) continued to drift upward, according to results from NAHB’s quarterly AD&C Financing Survey.  As the survey showed, relationships among the various subcategories of AD&C loans remained about the same, with the highest average interest rate—6.59 percent—recorded on loans for land acquisition loans, followed by 6.49 percent on loans for land development, 6.21 percent on loans for speculative single-family construction, and 5.97 percent on loans for pre-sold single-family construction.  In each case, the average rate in the second quarter of 2019 was higher than in either the first quarter of 2019 or the fourth quarter of 2018.  With the exception of loans for land acquisition, the average interest rate was the highest it’s been since the start of 2018, when NAHB began collecting the information (Exhibit 8).  The upward trend in interest rates on AD&C loans in 2019 occurred while the Federal Reserve’s target federal funds rate remained stable and mortgage rates were generally trending downward.

A higher interest rate on the outstanding balance drawn against an AD&C loan can, potentially, be offset by reducing points charged on the initial loan commitment.  Recently, in fact, loans for single-family construction have shown this tendency.  In the second quarter, average points on loans for speculative single-family construction declined from 79 to 71 basis points, and on loans for pre-sold single-family construction from 65 to 45 basis points—in both cases the lowest they’ve been since NAHB began collecting the information in the first quarter of 2018.  Meanwhile, the second-quarter averages of 99 basis points on loans for land acquisition and 103 on loans for land development remained at or near their post-2017 peaks.

The NAHB survey also asks builders and developers about the availability of credit relative to the previous quarter (better, about the same, or worse).  A net tightening index derived from the responses was -0.7 in the second quarter of 2019, compared to –8.0 in the first quarter. The index is constructed so that negative numbers indicate credit easing, positive numbers tightening, and zero perfectly stable conditions.  The second quarter reading of -0.7 is the closest the net tightening index has been to zero since 2009.  Meanwhile, a similar net tightening index derived from the Federal Reserve’s survey of senior loan officers also moved in the direction of stability in the second quarter, declining from 14.3 in the first quarter to 7.0.  Although the Fed index has persistently indicated tightening while the NAHB index has indicated easing, both indexes have been hovering in a relatively narrow band near the stability line for the past two years.

 



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: